Saturday, June 23, 2007

Count me in

So I'm reading my first Lee Child book. And I wonder to myself, what if Lee Child is having a bad day? Every writer has days when they think they stink. What if that's what Lee Child is thinking right now?



DEAR LEE CHILD:
YOU ARE A FREAKING WRITING GENIUS.

Some writers say they don't enjoy reading fiction as much anymore since they started writing because they can see everything the writer is doing, they can see where all the tricks and manipulations are being employed. And that's just fine, whatever works for you. But when I hear that I can't help but think, you're not reading very good fiction.


Because I can sort of see what Child is doing. If I go back over stuff I can sort of see where he's building tension, where he's racking up the plot, where he's twisting the screws to make you keep reading. But I also know he's doing a hundred other things I can't see, small things in the background that I'm not catching, and now I'm fascinated and I can't put the book down. Good fiction, no matter who you are, isn't see-through. Good fiction makes you put the book down and say, how did he do that?

There's always that mystery to writing, always more to be learned. Great writers show you how little you know.

And now I'm going to go back to it. Because I have to see how this thing ends.

Sunday, June 17, 2007

The Current Work-In-Progress

Just because I'm soooo close and I want to brag with one of those neat little internet thingies:



Back to it,
Abby

Friday, June 15, 2007

Summer Reading

So I started dabbling with Library Thing and now I'm sort of addicted. How nerdy is that? Here's how LT works: You go in and enter all of the books you own on their online database. You get to pick cover graphics, put reviews or notes, rate the books, categorize them, and sort them. So for the book addict, you not only get to fondle your real-life books, but fondle them electronically as well.

Like I said, nerdy. I love it.

The only thing is, I can now see exactly how big my to-be-read pile is. I've always sort of prided myself on having a manageable TBR pile; I buy books in spurts, then spend months reading what I have without buying more. Still, apparently I manage to buy more books than I'll ever read. I haven't bought books in a while and I'm interested in the new Shomi line coming out and Molly O'Keefe has another one next month and it's just about time to scour eBay for some out-of-print classics. (My last eBay venture found me some weird old Mary Stewarts, and the one before that netted me Bliss and Dance by Judy Cuevas.)






To add to all that, I went to the library. After hearing several folks (Miss Snark, Megan, and Kathleen my librarian for just a few) recommend them, I picked up a Jack Reacher book (do they have to be read in order? I couldn't tell) and a Kelley Armstrong I haven't read and Heyer's The Corinthian and Stephen King's The Colorado Kid.




Oh, and I just started Pam Rosenthal's The Slightest Provocation, and so far it's terrific. So now it's a nice summer day out and all I really want to do is read. Crap.

Some days, work just gets in the way. But I've been doing a lot of writing lately so I can go read, right?

Right?

What are you reading this summer?

Saturday, June 09, 2007

On Writer



Last night Stephen King was in Toronto, receiving a booksellers' award for lifetime achievement. There was an honorary ceremony, and an onstage interview by Chuck Klosterman. I was in the audience.

I've always wanted to see Stephen King in person. I don't know why. Maybe it's because he's such a fascinating writer, or maybe it's because I've been reading him for over twenty of the thirty years he's been writing. But deep down I've always just sort of wanted to know with my own eyes that he exists.

That sounds weird, but there you go. I've read so much Stephen King, in so many stages of my life, that he's hard to imagine as a human being. The Dead Zone was the first novel I read that made me want to be a writer; I literally read my copy of both it and The Stand to pieces, and have had to buy new ones over the years. (My copy of Firestarter has Drew Barrymore on it and is barely holding together.) I've read him through bad books and good, through serious moods and frivolous ones, through experiments both failed and successful.

King's appeal is no mystery: He simply appears to let you straight into his head, to wander the landscape, to pick objects up and turn them over and put them back down again. After several decades of loyal reading, many of us feel as if we've lived there, at least for a while, even if we never learned all of the place's secrets.

On Writing let us even further through the door and showed us that the landscape was more fascinating then we'd even imagined. The first time I read it, I tried to imagine what kind of balls it takes to admit you can barely remember writing Cujo because you were on so much coke. Most writers would shroud something like that, keep the illusion, pretend that they were in control of things all along. Not King.

In person, King is relaxed, confident, funny, and low-key, though he has a lot of charisma. Though he's obviously brilliant, he's not a writer with a capital W, thinking himself above the lowly masses; he can answer a convoluted question about the contraditory nature of both the normal and the fantastical in his work with: "I just like to make shit up." "I see writing as an essentially aggressive act," he said. "I want you to burn dinner. I want you to stop talking to your husband. I want you to put down everything you're doing and listen to what I'm doing here."

Maybe it's odd that a writer of romance is such a fan of a writer of horror? But those are just labels, really. "They call my books horror because they have to know what shelf to put them on in the bookstore," he said. "To me, they're just books."

"There's no need for writing classes as long as Robertson Davies' books are in print," he said near the end of the night. And that struck me. Because Stephen King was my writing school. He taught me pace, story, structure, voice, dialogue, and characterization.

Without ever being in the room.

Tuesday, June 05, 2007

The Neurotic Reader

I don't read Harlequin's site nearly as much as I should. It's sort of like Harlequin itself - vast, ever changing, a little confusing, and devilishly attractive. I've picked up Harlequin books and just longed for them, based on the cover, even though both the blurb and the writing indicate that I would hate it. (Yes, they've made their share of stinker covers, but someone there really knows how to design.) The site is the same way. It just looks like a fun place to hang out, if only you knew your way around and the cliques would let you in.

The latest thing I found there is the 10,000 book challenge. In which Harlequin challenges readers to read 100 books each and blog about them. The caveat: 50% of the reads should be Harlequin books.

It's a blatant ploy to grab online buzz and serious linkage in the form of a "contest", right? Surely no one would do it, right? It's like spending your own money on a t-shirt with a big corporate logo on it - paying for the privelege of advertising someone else. And NO one ever does that.

Well, maybe with any average batch of consumers, a company would have a hard time. But Harlequin is smart. They've tapped into two key qualities of their online readership: 1) they read big and 2) they are absolutely, utterly, list-obsessedly neurotic about their reads.

I've been on lots of online readers' groups over the years, and they make Rain Man look relaxed. Some of them make massive databases and Excel spreadsheets of their reads. They sort them by publisher and publishing year and generate reports and charts on how many five-star reads they've had per year, on average. They buy entire backlists of writers they have never tried, and then they either a) make themselves read every word even if they hate it or b) never get the gumption to touch a single one, leaving them pristine on the shelf as a "set". They do polls. They set goals to read hundreds of books a year and actually beat themselves up for not reaching them. They buy compluslively, collect and catalog, then compuslively discuss.

These guys are a bookseller's dream. Harlequin knows their market, and they're tapping into that neurosis. It goes without saying that the 10,000 book goal will be breezed over well before the year is up.

Just give them a spreadsheet, and let them do their thing.

Abby