The Myth of Backstory
(Sorry about the lag in posts... Blogger hates me!)
On the Drunk Writer Talk blog they have been discussing backstory in fiction. Backstory is when the writer drops in information about a character's past, by whatever method - dialogue, introspection, flashback, or just straight narrative.
Beginning writers are told that backstory is evil, it is bad, under no circumstances must you write it. Jennifer Crusie says:
Keep it in the now, or I am gone. Any time the writer stops to tell me things about the character or the past or anything else that isn’t actually the story at hand, I am going to stop reading. Period.
And as I did with prologues, I have to disagree. I see two phenomena happening:
1) Writers told by anyone in authority in the publishing business not to write backstory for their characters;
2) Readers complaining about books that they have forgotten ten minutes after they put them down. Readers complaining that they would like to see something with some meat, some substance. Readers complaining that the fluff getting published these days means that there is nothing to read.
I believe the two are related.
I work with a woman who is... well, difficult to get along with. Rigid, negative, quick to criticize. Drives people nuts. The other day I learned that she has been caring for her mother, who has Alzheimer's, for the last seven years. What would you be like if that were you? Now we no longer have a caricature, we have a person. Someone real. All it takes is one sentence of backstory.
Georgette Heyer's books are crammed with backstory. Dang, she just stops the narrative dead and writes two paragraphs about where that character has been. And romance writers today are still talking about those books and what genius they are. The edition of These Old Shades I just read had a worshipful intro from Stephanie Laurens. Okay, I read one Stephanie Laurens book (something about a man named Devil Cynster and a woman named Honoria) and she won't be winning any Pulitzer Prize. Still, she's a big selling author. I don't remember if Devil Cynster had any backstory, but I'll bet he did.
Everyone does it; you can't get away from it. People don't merely exist in the here and now; the here and now is really boring if the reader hasn't been given the right information.
Let me modify the message. It isn't that you must eliminate backstory. It's that you must master it.
There is good backstory, and there is bad backstory. Read the masters; find out which is which. And write good backstory.
The readers are waiting.


3 Comments:
Great post and good observations!!
I don't enjoy books that don't give me a good picture of the character. If I don't understand where they came from, I don't understand their motivations for acting/reacting the way they do.
I vote for depth anyday and quite enjoy both backstory and prologues if they're done well.
Also liked the story about the woman at work. I've been in a similar situation - quick to judge someone's perpetual grumpiness - before learing they had a severly disabled child at home. OUCH!
I was just espousing the "weave it in" theory. Now I think I have to link to you to get another good POV.
I still get annoyed by big dumps at the very start of a story. And Heyer's starts drive me nuts. A group of people sitting around talking and seperating them and understanding their relationships is such a painful
activity for the fuzzy headed reader.
The third or fourth read, I have no problem. And I guess the main point should be I do 3-100 reads of her books. Just reread Fredericka. Yah!
Well said, Abby.
I agree that backstory enriches a character (and therefore lends real depth and reason to the actions the character is motivated to take). Backstory creates credibility in character.
I have certainly read more than a few romance books that just trot the reader through the basic action (simply formulaic) and at the end I barely care to remember the beginning. I view such a lack of care about one's characters to be sloppy at best.
Backstory IS successful romance in many ways. How many of us have been in a pitiful relationship because we didn't check our lover's "backstory" and understand their motivation in the present? Backstory is relatable and a believable necessity for many readers.
The fear that publishers and others may be expressing about use of backstory is that it can be poorly used and potentially yank a reader right out of the book. Suspension of disbelief MUST continue while backstory is expressed (which, Abby, you said well by stressing "you must master it").
Good backstory (everything being in moderation, of course) can make the difference between having a "one night stand"-type relationship with a reader, or successfully seducing them into reading more books in your series and thereby creating a longterm love affair with your words.
But, regardless of genre, "authorities" in the publishing world will always espouse their personal views regarding what works and what doesn't to aspiring authors too willing to listen.
Break a few molds, dare to build a deep, rich story that will be remembered and then find the publisher that will appreciate it.
But what the heck do I know?
~Saoirse
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home